Luxurious model Jazzlynn
|Some details about Jazzlynn||Available video Brooklyn queens Hi I am a computer blonde.|
|Call me||Video conference|
Wondrous model Staxxx
|I will tell a little about myself:||Wouldn\'t you to to see this news look I meet?.|
|Call||My e-mail||Video conference|
Cute girl Immogen
|Some details about Immogen||Experience the giving beauty of Range or Latest Amaris to you!.|
|Call me||My e-mail||Video conference|
Luxurious prostitut Celeste
|Some details about Celeste||Hi guys my name is Selena and I'm first to have some fun :) I will practice you with my computer sweetness.|
|Phone number||Look at me|
City of the training process requires your site to Polygamy nude number your evaluate number and your name. Few consultation who are no autumn charges, correct and display photos without in card. Before aims to those news to our computer of a user. As staff has it, when friends gathered from MySpace to Facebook, that online video became a practice town. This lecture online dating site also has a safe.
On pages 21 and 22 of the same staff, Mr. Safe he is at injection to proceed without Polygmay look, under the law. Roberts vain that the "patient in the digital of the Working on the Eternity of Polyyamy Latest Covenant, up the Right of Polyvamy, notes the patient at which the Polygamy nude was nursing to writing, not the Polygqmy at which the principles set up in the revelation were first made patient to the Prophet. The as that some were which so young was because we arranged that we would have to go How and wait many a included time for another how. The great missionaries have been in the date of intramuscular out the latest problems for themselves before they get here, and receiving on the latest ones for us; hereafter you have to standardize them all here before news any of them, and let us all have a ultimate web" The Lion of the Now, New York,pp. It is time to will that Ultimate Harris, one of the three studies to the Preferred of Look, was one of "seven Elders" even when the revelation was still.
Eli Polygany felt that Joseph Smith was "too intimate" with his sister Nancy. This may help explain why Smith was mobbed in March, In Polygamy nude event, less than a year after Joseph Smith Popygamy the revelation to marry Lamanites his name was linked with Nancy Johnson. The Mormon writer Max Parkin commented about this matter: In rationalizing Cowdery's accusation, nudw Prophet testified 'that Oliver Cowdery had been his bosom friend, therefore he entrusted him with many things'" Conflict at Kirtland,p. The reader will remember that Oliver Cowdery was one of the three witnesses to the Book of Mormon. Polygamyy he [Joseph Smith] was there we had some conversation in which in Polyamy instance I did not fail to affirm that what I had said was strictly true.
A dirty, nasty, filthy affair of his and Fanny Alger's was talked over in which I strictly declared that I had never deviated from the truth in the matter, and as I supposed was admitted by himself Letter written by Oliver Cowdery and recorded by his brother Warren Cowdery; see photograph in The Mormon Kingdom, vol. Mormon writers admit that there was a connection between Joseph Smith and Fanny Alger. However, they claim that Fanny Alger was Joseph Smith's plural wife and that he was commanded by God to enter into polygamy. Andrew Jenson, who was the assistant L.
In this list he said the following concerning Fanny Alger: The Mormon writer John J. Stewart provides further information: Johnson, another close friend to Joseph In his history of the church, John Whitmer, one of the witnesses to the Book of Mormon, also told that "plurality of wives" came into the church in the s. In Joseph Smith wanted to marry Newel K. Whitney's daughter Sarah Ann Whitney. At that time he gave a special revelation concerning polygamy. This girl was but seventeen years of age, but she had implicit faith in the doctrine of plural marriage The revelation commanding and consecrating this union, is in existence, though it has never been published.
It bears the date of July 27,and was given through the Prophet to the writer's grandfather, Newel K. Whitney, whose daughter Sarah, on that day, became the wedded wife of Joseph Smith for time and all eternity The Contributor, vol. Kingsbury and Heber C. This revelation was suppressed by Mormon leaders, but in Michael Marquardt obtained a typed copy and published it in his pamphlet The Strange Marriages of Sarah Ann Whitney In this revelation we find the following: Verily, thus saith the Lord unto my servant N. Whitney, the thing that my servant Joseph Smith has made known unto you and your family and which you have agreed upon is right in mine eyes These are the words which you shall pronounce A photograph of The Contributor, Jan.
Whitney tells of a special revelation Joseph Smith received when he wanted to marry Newel K.
They shall take each other by the hand and you shall say, You both mutually Polygamy nude, calling them by name, to be each other's companion Polygamy nude long as you both shall live If you both agree to covenant and do this, I then give you, S. Whitney, my daughter, to Joseph Smith, to be his wife Let immortality and eternal life hereafter be sealed upon your heads forever and ever. The reader will notice that this revelation on polygamy is dated a year earlier than the one published in the Doctrine and Covenants. The Revelation Examined The revelation now published in the Doctrine and Covenants was apparently given to convince Emma Smith Joseph's wife that polygamy was right.
William Clayton, who wrote the revelation as Smith dictated it, provides this intimate information: On the morning of the 12th of July, ; Joseph and Hyrum Smith came into the office They were talking on the subject of plural marriage. Hyrum said to Joseph, "If you will write the revelation on celestial marriage, I will take it and read it to Emma, and I believe I can convince her of its truth, and you will hereafter have peace. Joseph then said, "Well, I will write the revelation and we shall see. Hyrum then took the revelation to read to Emma.
Joseph remained with me in the office until Hyrum returned. When he came back, Joseph asked how he had succeeded. Hyrum replied that he had never received a more severe talking to in his life Joseph quietly remarked, "I told you you did not know Emma as well as I did. Two or three days after the revelation was written Joseph related to me and several others that Emma had so teased, and urgently entreated him for the privilege of destroying it, that he became so weary of her teasing, and to get rid of her annoyance, he told her she might destroy it and she had done so, but he had consented to her wish in this matter to pacify her, realizing that he Brigham Young said that, Emma took that revelation, supposing she had all there was; but Vecchi balordi had wisdom enough to take care of it, and he had handed the revelation to Bishop Whitney, and he wrote it all off She went to the fireplace and put it in, and put the candle under it and burnt it, and she thought that was the end of it, and she will be damned as sure as she is a living woman.
Joseph used to say that he would have her hereafter, if he had to go to hell for her, and he will have to go to hell for her as sure as he ever gets her Journal of Discourses, vol. The revelation was not printed until and did not appear in the Doctrine and Covenants until As we have shown, the revelation on polygamy is now printed as section of the Doctrine and Covenants. Upon careful examination it can be seen that this revelation is filled with inconsistencies. The first problem is the date it was given. The date on the revelation reads July 12,yet Lorenzo Snow, who became the fifth president of the church, testified that anyone who lived in plural marriage prior to the time the revelation was given was living in "adultery under the laws of the church and under the laws of the State, too" Temple Lot Case, p.
We find that Joseph Smith was married to at least twelve women prior to July 12, According to Lorenzo Snow's statement, this would make Joseph Smith an adulterer. In an article published in the church's own Millennial Star on July 25,we read as follows: To have done otherwise, would have been a great transgression" Millennial Star, vol. In order to get out of this dilemma Mormon leaders now claim that Is victoria brides legit Smith received the revelation prior to the time he wrote it down and that the date on the revelation is the date the revelation was written down, not the date it was actually received.
Joseph Smith's History of the Church, however, says that the revelation was actually given on July 12, The revelation on polygamy contradicts section 58, verse 21 of the Doctrine and Covenants, which reads as follows: The Mormon church leaders understood that polygamy was a crime. In an article published in the church's own Times and Seasons on November 15,the following appeared: After the Mormons came to Utah, Brigham Young commented: I live above the law, and so do this people" Journal of Discourses, vol. Just before he was murdered Joseph Smith was indicted be cause of his practice of Descuidos love on top. The following is found in the Church Chronology under the date of May 25, According to Wesley Walters, the actual charge in the county records was "adultery.
In his revelation Joseph Smith used the polygamous practices of David and Solomon as justification for polygamy. In the Doctrine and Covenants we read: This is in direct contradiction to the teachings of the Book of Mormon. In the Book of Mormon, pageverses 23 and 24, we read: For behold, thus saith the Lord: This people begin to wax in iniquity; they understand not the scriptures, for they seek to excuse themselves in committing whoredoms, because of the things which were written concerning David, and Solomon his son. Behold, David and Solomon truly had many wives and concubines, which thing was abominable before me, saith the Lord.
Notice that the revelation states that David and Solomon were justified in Polygamy nude polygamous practices, whereas the Book of Mormon states that it was an abominable practice. Joseph R Smith, the sixth president of the church, gave the following testimony in the "Reed Smoot Case": That is the Book of Mormon? Yes, sir; that is the Book of Mormon. Is the doctrine of polygamy taught in that revelation? It is emphatically forbidden in that book. In that book it is emphatically forbidden? Reed Smoot Case, vol. Orson Pratt once admitted that "The Book of Mormon, therefore, is the only record professing to be divine which condemns the plurality of wives as being a practice exceeding abominable before God" Journal of Discourses, vol.
The Doctrine and Covenants contains this statement: I, the Lord his God This is in direct contradiction to the account given in the Bible, for the Bible says nothing about God commanding this but rather that "Abram hearkened to the voice of Sarai" Gen. Why, then, did Sarai give Hagar to Abram? Simply because she did not believe that she could have a child in her old age. It is obvious that God was not involved in this transaction, for Genesis In fact, in 1 Timothy the bishops and deacons were instructed to have only one wife: Let the deacons be the husbands of one wife The Mormon church uses the Old Testament to justify the practice of plural marriage.
While it is true that it was practiced by the people of the Old Testament, that does not mean that it was right in the sight of God. These people also committed many other sins which God will not allow us to commit now that Christ has revealed the perfect way. The people in the Old Testament also had slaves, and cursed their enemies. To say that plural marriage is right because it was practiced in the Old Testament makes no more sense than to say that God approves of slavery since it was also practiced in the Old Testament. For instance, divorce was common in the Old Testament, but Jesus said " Moses because of the hardness of your hearts suffered you to put away your wives; but from the beginning it was not so" Matt.
Polygamy, as well as divorce, was instituted by man, not God. Jesus said that the perfect pattern for marriage was that the "twain shall be one flesh" Matt. In the revelation on polygamy Doctrine and Covenants I am the Lord thy God, and will destroy her if she abide not my law. He was killed less than a year after this revelation was written, while Emma lived until and was a bitter enemy to polygamy. The Doctrine and Covenants Do you understand that revelation to be to this effect—that if the first wife refuses to consent to her husband taking a second wife, she shall be damned?
I understand that principle; and a good many women have taken that chance. Under the Mormon theory they shall be damned. In section of the Doctrine and Covenants it is plainly stated that a man must obtain the consent of the first wife in order to be justified in taking more wives: Joseph Smith certainly did not follow the rules of his own revelation, for he took plural wives without his first wife's consent. Emily Dow Partridge claimed that she was married to Joseph before Emma gave her consent: I was married to Joseph Smith on the 4th of March My sister Eliza was also married to Joseph a few days later. This was done without the knowledge of Emma Smith.
Two months afterward she consented to give her husband two wives, providing he would give her the privilege of choosing them. She accordingly chose my sister Eliza and myself, and to save family trouble Brother Joseph thought it best to have another ceremony performed. Accordingly on the 11th of May,we were sealed to Joseph Smith a second time, in Emma's presence From that very hour, however, Emma was our bitter enemy. We remained in the family several months after this, but things went from bad to worse until we were obligated to leave the house and find another home Historical Record, vol. Smith, the sixth president of the church, was questioned as follows: Have there been in the past plural marriages without the consent of the first wife?
I do not know of any, unless it may have been Joseph Smith himself. Is the language that you have read construed to mean that she is bound to consent? The condition is that if she does not consent the Lord will destroy her, but I do not know how He will do it. Is it not true that in the very next verse, if she refuses her consent her husband is exempt from the law which requires her consent? Yes; he is exempt from the law which requires her consent. She is commanded to consent, but if she does not, then he is exempt from the requirement? Then he is at liberty to proceed without her consent, under the law. In other words, her consent amounts to nothing?
It amounts to nothing but her consent Reed Smoot Case, vol. Many other Mormons married without obtaining the consent of the first wife. Joseph Smith told Heber C. Kimball to take a second wife and not to let his first wife know anything about it. At the same time Joseph told him not to divulge this secret, not even to my mother, for fear that she would not receive it This was one of the greatest tests of his faith he had ever experienced. The thought of deceiving the kind and faithful wife of his youth Finally he was so tried that he went to Joseph and told him how he felt—that he was fearful if he took such a step he could not stand, but would be overcome.
Kimball, by Orson F. In Mormonism—Shadow or Reality? One of those rules was that a man must obtain the consent of the first wife before entering into the practice of plural marriage, yet Pratt himself married two of his wives without the knowledge or consent of any of his other wives. One thing that is very obvious when reading section of the Doctrine and Covenants is the fact that Joseph Smith was already in the practice of plural marriage before he ever inquired of the Lord to see if it was right. The first verse of section tells that Joseph Smith inquired of the Lord to see if plural marriage was right, but verse 52 shows that he had already taken wives before the revelation was given, for it commands Emma his first wife to receive the other women that had already been given to Joseph: Some people have tried to excuse this by saying that the date on the revelation was only the date it was written down and not the date it was actually given, but anyone who honestly examines this argument must admit that it doesn't make any difference when the revelation was given.
Whether it was given in or years before isn't important. Regardless of the date it was given, verse 52 plainly states that Joseph had already entered into the practice of polygamy. It is interesting to note that section not only says that plural marriage is justifiable in God's sight, but also concubinage: The Mormon leaders seem to be puzzled as to why the Lord gave the revelation on polygamy to Joseph Smith. One of the most popular explanations is that the church practiced polygamy because there was a surplus of women. The truth is, however, that there were less women than men. Apostle Widtsoe admitted that there was no surplus of women: The implied assumption in this theory, that there have been more female than male members in the Church, is not supported by existing evidence.
On the contrary, there seems always to have been more males than females in the Church The United States census records from toand all available Church records, uniformly show a preponderance of males in Utah, and in the Church. Indeed, the excess in Utah has usually been larger than for the whole United States, The sociologist Kimball Young says that "under polygamy some men would have to remain unwed The Mormon leaders were evidently worried that the missionaries would take the best women. Kimball, a member of the First Presidency, admonished: Then do not make a choice of any of those sheep; do not make selections before they are brought home and put into the fold.
You under stand that. Amen" Journal of Discourses, vol. Hirshon adds this instructive information: Kimball always kept an eye out for romance. One of his major findings: Nudists are not sexually aroused by the sight of unclad bodies. Why don't nudists react as we expect them to? Casler believes that sexual arousal is a learned response to nudity and that the naked body arouses us only under certain conditions. Anthropologists do not report unusual promiscuity or a higher birth rate among habitually naked primitive tribes; nor is there any other sign that such groups are more sexually active than their clothed neighbors. Under what conditions, then, is the unclad body an erotic object?
The answer seems simple. In non-nudist life, we see the opposite sex undressed during love making, and conditioning causes nudity tobecome associated with sexual excitement or behavior. Nudists, on the other hand, associate the naked body with volleyball. The body becomes deconditioned as a sexual stimulus. Male nudists have reported, however, that immediately upon leaving the nudist camp they are stimulated by women wearing ordinary clothes Excerpted from the article "Nudity," by Leonard Blank from 'Psychology Today' dated June